Journal Technologies demo program • Proposed design, not an active Journal recognition scheme.
Purpose: celebrate helpful peer contributions and keep learning active between user conferences.
Three proposed pathways:
PEER GUIDE: share a sanitized onboarding tip, offer a useful answer and help a colleague find approved resources.
PRACTICE CONTRIBUTOR: contribute a planning template with context, revision history and peer-review feedback.
REGIONAL CONNECTOR: suggest a session topic, share a meetup recap and help organize an inclusive peer exchange.
Proposed process: contribution → nomination → community-team review → recognition. Journal would own final eligibility, consent, criteria, recognition names and approval. No badges are automatically awarded by this demo and no real member is represented as a champion.
Sample nomination structure:
Contribution link:
What made it helpful:
Who benefited (describe the role, not case details):
Suggested pathway:
Consent / permission to share a story:
Reviewer and decision date:
Use this discussion for a fictional or self-authored example only. Do not name or nominate a real person without their consent. Do not include personal contact details, client identities or case information.
